Questões de Concurso

OpenOffice Installs Insecure Java Version
By Brian Krebs
February 4, 2009; 5:30 PM ET

    An alert reader let me know that the latest version of OpenOffice, the open source alternative to the Microsoft Office productivity suite, also installs a very old, insecure version of Java.
    Users who accept the default installation options for OpenOffice 3.0.1 also will get Java 6 Update 7, a version of Java that Sun Microsystems released last spring (the latest version is Java 6 Update 12).
    This is notable because not only could attackers target security vulnerabilities that were fixed in subsequent versions of Java, but Java 6 Update 7 was released prior to Sun's inclusion of a feature known as "secure static versioning," which is intended to prevent Web sites from invoking even older versions of Java that may be present on the user's system.
    Starting with Java 6 Update 11, Sun included a feature that uninstalls older versions, but that functionality for whatever reason did not automatically remove versions prior to Java 6 Update 10.
    It's not clear why OpenOffice ships with this outdated version. For what it's worth, the latest version of OpenOffice appears to work just fine with the latest, Java 6 Update 12. I've sent a note to the OpenOffice security team to find out, and will post an update if I hear back from them.
    Finally, I should note that Sun only released Java 6 Update 12 a few days ago. However, Sun says there are no security updates in this latest version, so there is no need to update if all you care about is having the most secure version of Java.
    Update, Feb. 11, 3:09 p.m. ET: The OpenOffice.org security team responded that the newest version of Java caused installation problems with the latest version of OpenOffice. The group plans to ship the latest Java version with the next version of OpenOffice, due to be released at the end of March. In the meantime, a version of Open Office without the older Java version can be downloaded here

(Adapted from http://voices.washingtonpost.com.securityfix/2009/02/openoffice_installs_insecure_j.html)

Your answers to questions 21-24 must be based on the text below.

In June this year, the BRICs, the world’s newest economic grouping, ended their first major summit by calling for a stable, predictable and more diversified international monetary system. But the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India and China, stopped short of criticising the world’s dominant currency, the US dollar. The group repeated calls for a bigger say in the global financial system through greater representation at major institutions, such as the World Bank.

But the final statement issued by the leaders made no reference to developing new reserve currencies to challenge the dollar, which Russia had called for at a separate event earlier in the day.

Analysts say that as the global recession bites, the four Bric nations are showing a growing willingness to work together. One expert claimed the significance of the summit would be political rather than economic.

(BBC News 16/6/09, adapted)

For questions 72 through 75, choose the best answer in accordance with Text 3

Text 3 Armenia : prisoner of history

ARMENIA tends to feature in the news because of its problems (history, geography, demography and economics to name but a few). But a new report says not all is doom and gloom. The parliamentary elections in May showed significant improvement. Media coverage was more balanced, and the authorities permitted greater freedom of assembly, expression and movement than in previous
years. That bodes well for the future.
The economy is still recovering from the global financial crisis, which saw GDP contract by 14.2% in 2009. In the same period, the construction sector contracted by more than 40%. Remittances from the diaspora dropped by 30%. That led Forbes magazine to label Armenia the world's second worst performing economy in 2011. Over one-third of the country lives below the poverty line. Complaints of corruption are widespread, and inflation is high.
Low rates of tax collection-19.3% of GDP, compared with a 40% average in EU countries–limit the government's reach. Cracking down on tax evasion could increase government revenue by over $400 million, says the World Bank. A few, high-profile businessmen dominate the economy. Their monopolies and oligopolies put a significant brake on business development. Their influence also weakens political will for the kind of reforms that the country sorely needs.

[From The Economist print edition June 24, 012]